The combination of Architecture - Science - Art conjugating the principles of new typologies both promotes and solves various issues as defined by their technical subsistence, or even at a conscience level in which case it responds to the social content and message invited to convey.

A building is never ready to be assessed as contemporary. Nor will it ever be. Transition from the end to the beginning, is defined as natural consequence of a formalistic reality, however formed by a string of cumulative values and events - acts, given that it uses to the full at each time momentum, those conditions allowing partial functions having marginally exceeded the needs of the socially included materialized project.

What is looked for through architecture is an aggregate of rules to be applied by Architecture itself. A house not aesthetically complete is not necessarily detrimental to the environment, nor the opposite. However, a detrimental and chaotically regulated environment cannot embrace a beautiful house. The sense of urgency, many times, most of the time actually, will enhance or downplay the relatively uncertain shape since it will comply either with financial targets or with targets based on aesthetic criteria or both.

Therefore the unprecedented, each time depending on the occasion, verifies the rule with which it will comply and which it simultaneously creates. Architectural composition both defines and is defined by itself, however, the functional aspect of the materialized project allows its integration thus ensuring its historical place. The shelter is the shell and man each time attributes to Architecture splendor depending on the choices determined by cultural momentum though time.